3 years ago
400
Denver Post sports writer Patrick Saunders with the latest installment of his Rockies Mailbag.
Pose a Rockies — oregon MLB — related question for the Rockies Mailbag.
I was curious, wherefore are immoderate teams capable to make and turn large players twelvemonth aft twelvemonth successful their workplace systems, and wherefore bash different teams look to conflict successful this area? And for the Rockies, what is the biggest interest successful regards to their workplace strategy astatine the contiguous time? Do they request much endowment oregon bash they request to revamp the operation and model of their workplace system? Or both?
— Ryan, Longmont
Ryan, that’s a immense question with a batch of moving parts. I don’t person the clip oregon abstraction to bash a heavy dive into that taxable for this mailbag. My colleague, Kyle Newman, wrote a communicative astir the state of Colorado’s workplace system backmost successful March.
“This is genuinely wherever the Rockies are — a bottom-five system,” said Dan Evans, the Dodgers erstwhile GM. “Their (system) isn’t depleted due to the fact that of deals. They’re present retired of their ain flawed process and flawed drafting.”
However, it’s lone just to constituent retired the astir franchises acquisition ebbs and flows successful endowment astatine the insignificant league level. The Rockies bespeak that.
Here is however Baseball America has ranked Colorado’s workplace strategy implicit the past fewer years: 2014, 11th; 2015, eighth; 2016, sixth; 2017, 10th; 2018, 19th; 2020, 29th; and 2021, 25th.
As it stands now, the Rockies are airy connected pitching endowment and mediate infielders but person a fig of intriguing prospects astatine 3rd and archetypal basal and successful the infield.
One happening I person been told by galore radical successful the shot manufacture is that the Rockies’ comparatively tiny analytics section hinders their improvement of their young players.
Good time Patrick. How bash teams similar Milwaukee, Tampa Bay and Oakland — with beneath league mean payrolls — vie with the elephantine payrolls of the Los Angeles and New York teams, Boston, Houston and the like? Is it much a equilibrium of scouting, endowment valuation and fund that leads to success? Thank you.
— Robert Emmerling, Limon
Robert, the 3 teams you mentioned each person a doctrine and they instrumentality to it. That’s particularly existent of Tampa Bay.
This is what I wrote past twelvemonth arsenic the Rays took connected the Dodgers successful the World Series:
“There are a fig of pillars successful the Rays’ blueprint, main among them, strict adherence to analytics, predominant roster turnover, reliance connected trades and a refusal to manus retired big-money contracts, nary substance however fashionable the subordinate mightiness be.”
I besides wrote this:
“The comparatively accepted Rockies, who see themselves a draft-and-development organization, person paid large wealth for stars and instrumentality favorites specified arsenic 3rd Nolan Arenado and right-fielder Charlie Blackmon. Before the 2019 season, Arenado signed an eight-year, $260-million contract, though helium tin opt retired of the woody pursuing the 2021 season. At the opening of the 2018 season, Blackmon signed a six-year, $108-million declaration that includes subordinate options for 2022 and ’23.”
The Rockies thin to autumn successful emotion with their stars and it has ended up costing them successful the agelong run. For example, successful my opinion, the Rockies should person traded Trevor Story past winter.
The A’s and the Rays volition instrumentality a gamble connected a rental subordinate astatine the commercialized deadline if they are successful the hunt. They aren’t acrophobic to beryllium bold – for the abbreviated term. But then, neither of those franchises draws fans arsenic good arsenic the Rockies. In 2019, astir 3 cardinal fans came to Coors Field, portion the A’s drew 1.6 cardinal and the Rays conscionable 1.2 million.
I conjecture it comes down to however a franchise defines success.
OK, truthful the Rockies decided not to commercialized Trevor Story reasoning they volition get a decent compensatory draught pick. With what Story said astir not being traded, would you blasted him for wanting to beryllium the remainder of the play to debar injury, archer Dick Monfort goodbye successful a subtle way, and past thrust disconnected to a caller team? My reasoning is I wouldn’t blasted him.
— Del, Lamar
Del, Story would ne'er bash that. He’s excessively overmuch of a pro and his values wouldn’t licence it. Plus, he’s going to beryllium looking for a large payday this winter. Considering that he’s had a disappointing play – a origin arsenic to wherefore the Rockies did not plaything a commercialized for him – Story needs to interruption retired successful his last 2 months successful a Rockies uniform. There are questions among different teams astir his bat, arsenic good arsenic his arm. I deliberation Story has a agleam future, but helium needs the adjacent 2 months to heighten his value.
Patrick, what are the chances Trevor Story really re-signs with america adjacent year? I can’t ideate it’s a precocious percentage.
And however bash you deliberation the infield looks successful 2022? Here’s what I’m thinking. Brendan Rodgers would beryllium a fastener astatine shortstop. Ryan McMahon astatine 3rd and Chris Owings — hopefully steadfast — astatine second. I’m rooting for Connor Joe to triumph that archetypal basal spot — astatine slightest until Michael Toglia is big-league ready. He’s been connected occurrence of late. What says you?
— Mark, Arvada
I’ve talked with immoderate radical who judge Story mightiness instrumentality the Rockies’ qualifying connection (about $19 million), but I uncertainty that happens. I besides don’t deliberation helium volition re-sign a semipermanent deal. He wants to triumph present and the Rockies’ model to beryllium a contender isn’t unfastened close now.
As for the infield, I hold that Rodgers volition beryllium astatine abbreviated and McMahon astatine third. The caveat is if the Rockies were to wage for a escaped cause astatine 2nd oregon short, past Rodgers would determination to the unfastened spot.
Joe astatine archetypal basal is simply a possibility. Ideally, you privation much powerfulness retired of the position, but Joe mightiness beryllium the answer. As this play closes out, we’ll spot if Joe is an mundane subordinate oregon a inferior player. I don’t spot Chris Owings backmost with the squad adjacent year. Current archetypal baseman C.J. Cron mightiness instrumentality – accent connected might.
Pose a Rockies — oregon MLB — related question for the Rockies Mailbag.
English (US) ·