Divided Supreme Court leaves Texas abortion law in place

WASHINGTON — A profoundly divided Supreme Court is allowing a Texas instrumentality that bans astir abortions to stay successful force, stripping astir women of the close to an termination successful the nation’s second-largest state.

The tribunal voted 5-4 to contradict an exigency entreaty from termination providers and others that sought to artifact enforcement of the instrumentality that went into effect Wednesday.

The Texas law, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott successful May, prohibits abortions erstwhile aesculapian professionals tin observe cardiac activity, usually astir six weeks and earlier astir women cognize they’re pregnant.

It is the strictest instrumentality against termination rights successful the United States since the precocious court’s landmark Roe v. Wade determination successful 1973 and portion of a broader propulsion by Republicans crossed the state to enforce caller restrictions connected abortion. At slightest 12 different states person enacted bans aboriginal successful pregnancy, but each person been blocked from going into effect.

The precocious court’s bid declining to halt the Texas instrumentality came conscionable earlier midnight Wednesday.

“In reaching this conclusion, we accent that we bash not purport to resoluteness definitively immoderate jurisdictional oregon substantive assertion successful the applicants’ lawsuit. In particular, this bid is not based connected immoderate decision astir the constitutionality of Texas’s law, and successful nary mode limits different procedurally due challenges to the Texas law, including successful Texas authorities courts,” the unsigned bid said.

Chief Justice John Roberts dissented on with the court’s 3 wide justices: Justice Stephen Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan. Each of the 4 dissenting justices wrote abstracted statements underscoring their disagreement with the majority.

Texas lawmakers wrote the instrumentality to evade national tribunal reappraisal by allowing backstage citizens to bring civilian lawsuits successful authorities tribunal against anyone progressive successful an abortion, different than the patient. Other termination laws are enforced by authorities and section officials, with transgression sanctions possible.

After a national appeals tribunal refused to let a punctual reappraisal of the instrumentality earlier it took effect, the measure’s opponents sought Supreme Court review.

Texas has agelong had immoderate of the nation’s toughest termination restrictions, including a sweeping instrumentality passed successful 2013. The Supreme Court yet struck down that law, but not earlier much than fractional of the state’s 40-plus clinics closed.

Even earlier the Texas lawsuit arrived astatine the precocious tribunal the justices had planned to tackle the contented of termination rights successful a large lawsuit aft the tribunal begins proceeding arguments again successful the fall. That lawsuit involves the authorities of Mississippi, which is asking to beryllium allowed to enforce an termination prohibition aft 15 weeks of pregnancy.

___

Associated Press writer Paul J. Weber successful Austin, Texas, contributed to this report.