3 years ago
317
Dear Amy: I’ve met a fantastic man. We’ve been dating for 7 months — 3 online during COVID, and 4 months successful existent life.
We’re older (I’m 45, he’s 40) and person talked astir moving successful unneurotic and perchance having children. The occupation is his ex-girlfriend. They dated for 2 years, past divided up and stayed friends. Over the past 10 years, she’s remained a ample portion of his life.
She calls and texts him constantly. They spell hiking and camping astir each weekend, and she attends each of his household events. I haven’t adjacent been invited to a household games’ nighttime yet, but erstwhile I americium yet invited, his ex volition beryllium close determination erstwhile I yet conscionable his siblings and their families. Oh, and due to the fact that the household lives successful the adjacent municipality over, we’ll beryllium carpooling with her.
While helium says that I’m his priority, I consciousness similar I’m warring for a spot successful his beingness wherever determination already is simply a girlfriend.
Am I incorrect to deliberation this is weird? Or should I judge that she is portion of the household and suck it up?
— No Package Deal
Dear No Deal: Your guy’s adjacent relationship with his ex mightiness beryllium unusual, but … let’s bash you.
Why are you earnestly considering cohabiting and having children with idiosyncratic erstwhile you person specified an important (and basic) question astir his different relationships?
If I told you that your guy’s concern is not astatine each “weird,” would you unreserved guardant with assurance that your ain instincts and feelings would cease to substance truthful much?
Your feelings are wholly valid. Because they are yours.
You and your feline are older. You’ve some lived fractional of your lives — and you person formed and person the close to support your beardown relationships and friendships. But yes — different relationships displacement and marque mode erstwhile you signifier a household with someone.
If this different pistillate has transitioned from an ex-partner to an every-weekend buddy and forever-friend, then, arsenic your guy’s “priority,” you should not lone beryllium brought into the fold, but you should beryllium enactment first.
“Priority” means: first. It’s hard to spot however you are a precedence erstwhile your fellow is hiking and camping astir each play with idiosyncratic else.
No 1 other should determine what is close for you, but it would beryllium omniscient for you to dilatory mode down until you consciousness large astir your spot successful this peculiar narration triangle.
Dear Amy: My hubby refuses to get the COVID vaccine. He thinks it is simply a “government plot.”
He adjacent got COVID implicit the 4th of July play and had to beryllium hospitalized.
He recovered but is suffering from recurring bouts of weakness and debased O2 levels.
We are connected other sides of the governmental spectrum and person managed to bask 5 years of matrimony by NOT talking astir politics.
However, I person seen what COVID did to him, however it made him feel, and I bash NOT recognize wherefore helium would privation to acquisition it again.
It besides frightened maine to decease erstwhile we got the diagnosis successful the hospital, but, due to the fact that helium “beat” it, helium thinks everything is OK.
I consciousness this would beryllium a dividing constituent successful our marriage.
— TIA
Dear TIA: I deliberation it is decidedly clip for you 2 to speech astir politics, and for you some to sermon your values, beliefs, and points of view.
Believing successful a bizarro conspiracy mentation is not a governmental statement, successful my opinion. It’s conscionable … bananas. Does your hubby person akin theories astir fluoride, humans landing connected the moon, Pizzagate?
Having these challenging conversations present would beryllium preferable to learning astir your husband’s existent beliefs portion you’re pacing extracurricular of the ICU, oregon connected a vacation to Area 51.
You mightiness person successfully delayed these conversations for galore much years, but the pandemic has forced immoderate tougher truths person to the surface.
Dear Amy: These are specified weird times. I americium speechmaking astir challenges successful your file I ne'er would person imagined encountering successful my lifetime.
I conjecture I conscionable wanted to fto you cognize that I truly admit your measured responses to astir questions.
I don’t ever hold with you, but I astir ever similar your tone.
— Big Fan
Dear Fan: Many of america person wished (ironically) to unrecorded successful “challenging times.”
We should person been much cautious astir what we’d wished for!
In presumption of my “tone,” convey you for your comment. I lone privation my parent was astir to work it.
(You tin email Amy Dickinson astatine askamy@amydickinson.com oregon nonstop a missive to Ask Amy, P.O. Box 194, Freeville, NY 13068. You tin besides travel her connected Twitter @askingamy oregon Facebook.)
English (US) ·