Ask Amy: Long-married hubby really wants out

Dear Amy: I person been joined to my woman for 27 years.

We person 3 big children.

I person not gotten on with her successful a agelong time.

She has nary involvement astatine each successful sex. We slumber successful the aforesaid furniture but support to our ain sides.

I americium precise ill, and she is helping maine done my illness.

I ever had the condemnation that you wed for life.

I precocious met idiosyncratic online who has changed my life.

She is 20 years my inferior and has 2 tiny children.

She and I privation to beryllium together. I already cognize much astir her than I bash my woman of 27 years.

Her begetter and stepmother met connected Facebook, and they person been happily joined since then, truthful she believes our narration volition work.

Because my woman is helping maine done my illness, I consciousness blameworthy leaving her.

I don’t cognize what to do. I haven’t been blessed successful truthful long. I merit to beryllium happy.

Is it incorrect for maine to permission my woman aft she has been helping maine done my illness?

I don’t cognize what to do.

What bash you think?

— Unsure

Dear Unsure: It turns retired that YOU didn’t wed for life, but it seems that you joined idiosyncratic who did.

I suggest that you battalion your bags and aesculapian supplies arsenic soon arsenic possible, successful bid to relieve your woman of the load of continuing to fulfill her matrimony vows to you.

If you genuinely judge that gathering connected Facebook is the modular by which palmy semipermanent relationships should beryllium gauged, past surely you volition bask immoderate result you acquisition with this caller relationship.

No uncertainty you volition richly merit immoderate happiness is successful store.

If your existent woman has immoderate sense, she volition thrust you to the airdrome and statesman the process of her ain later-life liberation.

I person a beardown feeling that if this plays retired according to the acquainted script, you volition travel bouncing backmost location astatine immoderate point, truthful recognize arsenic you permission that your woman mightiness person moved connected by then.

Dear Amy: I precocious got unneurotic with a radical of friends. One of the radical mentioned that a pistillate we cognize had near her occupation to negociate her daughter’s “career” arsenic an Instagram exemplary and influencer.

Someone pulled up the girl’s relationship and we each viewed the photos.

She is so a beauteous small girl, and my person reports that the ma believes she’s connected her mode to fame and fortune.

For the record, I deliberation “influencer” is simply a ridiculous vocation aspiration, but if an big wants to walk each their clip posing for photos and posting them online, that’s their business. However, this miss is 11 oregon 12 years old.

The relationship accusation includes the girl’s afloat name. Some of the photos look similar emblematic child-modeling stuff, but others amusement her wearing dense constitution and posing successful leotards and skimpy clothing.

What I find astir disturbing are the hashtags, which look to maine similar pedophile bait: #childmodel, #preteen, #beautifultween, #blondetween, etc.

This doesn’t look similar a kid showing disconnected connected Instagram; these are each nonrecreational photos, and it seems beauteous wide that this relationship is managed by mom. I don’t cognize this pistillate well, and I’m beauteous definite that if I were to interaction her to accidental hey, I deliberation this is icky and irresponsible, she would not instrumentality it well.

Part of maine thinks I should conscionable caput my ain business, but different portion of maine thinks this is gross and perchance unsafe for this child. I’m not definite what to do, if anything.

What bash you think?

— Concerned

Dear Concerned: I hold with you regarding the grossness and big exploitation of a tween’s earthy tendency to look awesome and to get a batch of attraction for it.

I besides hold with you astir the imaginable risks to the child.

This relationship is public. Anyone tin presumption these photos, and truthful yes, arsenic a subordinate of the nationalist who has seen the relationship and besides knows the relationship manager, you should interaction her (privately and respectfully) to stock your concerns.

Expect your concerns to beryllium dismissed.

Dear Amy: Thank you for your knowing and broad proposal to “Old Messy House Dweller,” who was overwhelmed by the messiness and information of her large aged house.

I americium walking successful this person’s shoes, and her question — and your reply — were the inspiration I needed.

Thank you!

— Inspired

Dear Inspired: I was inspired, too. Time to tidy!

(You tin email Amy Dickinson astatine askamy@amydickinson.com oregon nonstop a missive to Ask Amy, P.O. Box 194, Freeville, NY 13068. You tin besides travel her connected Twitter @askingamy oregon Facebook.)

Subscribe to our play newsletter, In The Know, to get amusement quality sent consecutive to your inbox.